BDS group shown up by Palestinian Ambassador
Ali Hamlleh who dismissed their radical views
Story and pics by Steph Hodes
Despite calls by student groups for a boycott of a visiting Israeli student delegation called What Is Rael last week, the delegation received unexpectedly warm welcomes from Palestinian envoy Ambassador Ali Hamlleh and Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu during their ten-day visit to SA.
The students, who were invited and hosted by the South African Union of Jewish Students (SAUJS) in partnership with the World Union of Jewish Students, represented the broad spectrum of political views found in Israeli society. With the increase of anti-Israel propaganda on campuses across SA, SAUJS felt it was time for a fresh approach to traditional Israel advocacy. The objective of the project was for ordinary South African students to meet authentic Israelis and engage in honest and open dialogue about the conflict and life in Israel.
Catching wind of the project before the students arrived, pro-Palestinian groups immediately called on student societies to boycott the visit of what they labeled “apartheid agents coming to polish Israel’s image.”
They also claimed the students had been deployed by the Israeli government, and declared that “SA campuses must be apartheid Israel-free zones.”
Despite intimidation and threats by various student societies the Israeli students held panel discussions at Wits, UJ and UCT. They also visited TUKS and Stellenbosch Universities.
Attempts by pro-Palestinian groups to disrupt these visits were disappointing on a number of levels. Their insistence that ordinary students be prevented from dialogue with the Israelis displayed their immense discomfort with contradicting views on campus, revealing what appeared to be their own skewed narrative and a clear agenda by those purporting to represent Palestinians.
Using the Apartheid analogy to stir up emotions, they rejected dialogue on all fronts, stating that boycotts were instrumental in the defeat of the apartheid regime in South Africa”, and in turn, boycotting Israel would be the “kernel in overthrowing the oppression of Palestinians”.
In doing so, these groups trampled on freedom of thought and expression, fundamental values held dear by our universities.
Instead of recognizing the role South Africans could play in this conflict - that of sharing our own lessons of reconciliation and nation-building - the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) working group was shown up for acting ‘more Palestinian than the Palestinians,’ and presenting radical views that were later dismissed by Palestinian envoy Amb. Ali Hamlleh.
The Ambassador, who welcomed the students personally at a meeting at his office in Pretoria, assured them that the pro-Palestinian groups they had encountered on campus were not funded by the embassy. He told the students that these groups did not represent the views of the Palestinian Authority, which rejects the notion of boycotting Israel all together.
Ambassador Hamlleh endorsed the idea of dialogue between Israelis and Palestinians, and wished the group well on their visit to SA.
At the request of SAUJS, Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu met with the students in Cape Town. Tutu, who has been a figurehead in the boycott of Israel campaign, affirmed his belief that Israel has a right to exist within secure borders. He did however convey his disapproval of some actions of the Jewish State, whose people he says have a long history of oppression and persecution, and should thus be more sensitive than anyone else to human rights.
He expressed his sincere desire for peace between Israeli and Palestinians and an end to the conflict. At the request of one of the Israeli students, Tutu said a prayer for the victims of a terrorism attack that had taken place in Israel just minutes before the meeting.
What was by far the most disappointing aspect of the trip, was the unwillingness of SA student representatives to stand up for the values of freedom of speech and democracy.
The only Student Representative Council (SRC) to denounce the dirty tactics of the student groups, who tried to prevent dialogue, was UCT. Its president, Amanda Ngwenya, attended the panel discussion at UCT and later expressed outrage and regret after well-known activist Zackie Achmat and Israeli anarchist Jonathan Pollack continuously disrupted the event in an aggressive and undignified manner.
The brave student took a stand against what she labeled “bully tactics.” Writing to the Mail & Guardian about the experience, Ngwenya said Achmat’s behaviour “was an affront to freedom of thought and expression.” She further wrote that “UCT students did not reap the benefit of being at a university — that of being able to process ideas and formulate disagreement or agreement. Instead they were bullied and prevented from individual inquiry.”
Despite the hostility faced on campuses and the constant attacks on their integrity, the Israeli students remained undeterred and completed their trip with determination and conviction.
Unaffiliated students on campus received the Israelis well, and showed eagerness to listen to their side of the story, resulting in new friendships being formed and an overall deeper understanding of the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
SAUJS is proud to have hosted this initiative and believes that peace will only be achieved through dialogue. We will continue to pursue and defend freedom of speech on our campuses and stand up to those who try to denounce the existence of our Jewish State through meaningful dialogue and engagement.
Steph Hodes is the national chair of the SA Union of Jewish Students.
IS-RAEL members engaging with Desmond Tutu.jpg
The very notion of a
The very notion of a university is under siege in South Africa: since ancient times, a university was meant to be a place where people of differing points of view could meet to exchange ideas in a safe and encouraging atmosphere of tolerance: see the definition in Wikipedia: "Authentica habita" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authentica_habita
Quoting Wikipedia:- "on 18 September 1988 430 university rectors signed the Magna Charta Universitatum, marking the 900th anniversary of Bologna's foundation. The number of universities signing the Magna Charta Universitatum continues to grow, drawing from all parts of the world."
South African universities have declined into becoming some sort of historical throwback to an age of hatred and intolerance. There are few faculties and campuses which are now world standard. The literacy rate amongst first year students is a shocker. Just as these boorish thugs wake up to the "Palestinian cause", the rest of the world tires of the lies and the thuggery which has held the world to ransom since the 1960's. The Arab world is in turmoil. The old order is passing - and who knows where the "Palestinian cause" will be in 12 months? - Just as South Africa eventually had the last "Communist Party" in the world, long after that ideology had become a sad joke in the rest of the world, so too we will probably host the last Palestinian supporters.
Indeed, quoting the above, "the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) working group was shown up for acting ‘more Palestinian than the Palestinians,’ and presenting radical views that were later dismissed by Palestinian envoy Amb. Ali Hamlleh"
Exactly.
Does this ring a bell? - "“SA campuses must be apartheid Israel-free zones." Shades of Fatima Hajaig? Would you like to look up the term "Judenfrei" on Wikipedia? - find it at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judenfrei
Our universities are doing the intellectual equivalent of burning books. It was Heinrich Heine who said, "where they burn books, they will ultimately burn people also ..."
It is terribly sad that such a wonderful concept, the university, can be so perverted.
Good luck, Amanda Ngwenya - perhaps the proud traditions of UCT can buck the trend, and be what no other South African university can be - a real university ...
Lion613
You ignore the fact that the
You ignore the fact that the student in question is a leader of the youth component of a political party (the DA) that has taken a stance on What is Rael. She is therefore not unbiased, but of course it is convenient to represent her that way.
An openly Zionist supporter
An openly Zionist supporter we admit to being. We guess you are not, but note that you post this comment under the cloak of anonymity. You are welcome to do so on this website but it does raise the obvious question of why...
That's not my point: I
That's not my point: I haven't said much about Zionism one way or the other: my point, as I think is hers, is that I have a problem in the case of university campuses which become places of intolerance. This is not Parliament, or Hyde Park, or the Friday lunch-time verbal torpedo which gets launched against Israel in some Mosques (or, while I'm at it, the Friday evening verbal torpedo which gets launched against "the goyim" from the pulpits of some shuls): these are campuses of institutions which were specifically established to be safe havens for the flourishing of thought in its purest and noblest form, and to follow wherever that may lead. A university is different from a technical college with a how-to attitude to its subject matter. It goes way beyond that - or rather, it did, and now apparently it doesn't, in some universities.
The fact that what she said happens to support Israel in this instance doesn't make her a Zionist in any way at all - I doubt that that was on her agenda. I think she was simply standing up for the noble concept of free speech. I am a little concerned that you should see an agenda in someone who supports free speech. It is an ideal all on its own.
It just so happens that free speech, democracy and open dialogue are a Zionist's best protection: but that doesn't mean that everyone who is in favour of these things is a Zionist!
Lion613